South Korea’s Top Court Forces Samsung to Include Bonuses in Severance Pay

Share

Reading time: 2 min

South Korea’s Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling against Samsung Electronics, mandating the tech giant include performance bonuses when calculating severance pay for departing employees (according to Yonhap News). The decision marks a significant victory for workers’ rights in Asia Pacific’s largest technology hub.

samsung banner letters on a building

The ruling concluded a protracted legal dispute that began when 15 former Samsung Electronics employees sued the company in 2019, claiming their severance packages were calculated using artificially low average wages. The plaintiffs argued Samsung deliberately excluded “target incentives” — performance-based bonuses tied to project and departmental achievements — from their final wage calculations, reducing their entitled severance payments.

The Supreme Court definitively ruled that these target incentives constitute “payment in exchange for labor” based on their function, purpose, and detailed assessment criteria. This classification means such bonuses must be included in the “average wage” used as the foundation for severance pay calculations, following the standard practice of dividing final three-month wages by total working days.

Regional Impact on Employment Practices

This precedent-setting decision could reshape employment compensation across South Korea’s technology sector and potentially influence similar cases throughout Asia Pacific. Samsung Electronics, as one of the region’s most prominent employers and a bellwether for corporate practices, often sets standards that other multinational companies follow.

The ruling particularly impacts South Korea’s performance-driven corporate culture, where bonuses and incentives form substantial portions of employee compensation packages. Companies across the country may need to reassess their severance calculation methods to ensure compliance with this expanded definition of wages subject to severance obligations.

What’s Next for Korean Corporate Law

Legal experts anticipate this ruling will prompt widespread reviews of employment contracts and severance policies among major Korean conglomerates. The decision strengthens worker protections in a country where job security concerns have intensified amid economic uncertainties and technological disruption.

For Samsung, the immediate financial impact remains unclear, but the company will likely need to adjust its HR policies and potentially face additional claims from other former employees. The ruling also signals South Korea’s courts are increasingly willing to interpret employment law in favor of workers, potentially encouraging more labor-related litigation across Asia Pacific’s dynamic job market.

Disclaimer: Finonity provides financial news and market analysis for informational purposes only. Nothing published on this site constitutes investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Artur Szablowski
Artur Szablowski
Chief Editor & Economic Analyst - Artur Szabłowski is the Chief Editor. He holds a Master of Science in Data Science from the University of Colorado Boulder and an engineering degree from Wrocław University of Science and Technology. With over 10 years of experience in business and finance, Artur leads Szabłowski I Wspólnicy Sp. z o.o. — a Warsaw-based accounting and financial advisory firm serving corporate clients across Europe. An active member of the Association of Accountants in Poland (SKwP), he combines hands-on expertise in corporate finance, tax strategy, and macroeconomic analysis with a data-driven editorial approach. At Finonity, he specializes in central bank policy, inflation dynamics, and the economic forces shaping global markets.

Read more

Latest News